On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 16:03:00 -0800, the infamous "azotic"
scrawled the following:

-snip-
The Sunday Times has since found that the scientific paper on which the IPCC
based its claim had not been peer reviewed, nor published, at the time the
climate body issued its report.

When the paper was eventually published, in 2008, it had a new caveat. It
said: "We find insufficient evidence to claim a statistical relationship
between global temperature increase and catastrophe losses."

Despite this change the IPCC did not issue a clarification ahead of the
Copenhagen climate summit last month. It has also emerged that at least two
scientific reviewers who checked drafts of the IPCC report urged greater
caution in proposing a link between climate change and disaster impacts -
but were ignored.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...fset=12&page=2

It just keeps getting better, doesn't it? Now if we could convince
AGWK's True Believers...

---
"Some of us are wondering if we have created a monster."
Kevin Vranes, climate scientist, University of Colorado
talking about global warming hysteria, January, 2007.