On Jan 23, 4:33*pm, Swingman wrote:
On 1/23/2010 1:50 PM, Robatoy wrote:

Those that won't believe any of it, will go to any length to prove
their point, they will argue that the speck of dirt on a thermometer
1000 miles away has skewed the readings. IOW, it doesn't matter what
you serve them up as fact, there is something wrong with it.

Please note that the _issue_ is AGW, NOT cyclic variations in global
climate.

http://www.drroyspencer.com/research...rming-as-a-nat...

The original post asked for "scientific" refutation ... nothing but hot
air thus far ... maybe that's the problem, eh?

--www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 10/22/08
KarlC@ (the obvious)

Trying to make any of the science stick is like trying to sew a button
onto a poached egg.
It's like farting in a hurricane.... you KNOW that fart is in there
and you KNOW it HAS TO alter that hurricane in some way...but...

It is all hot air and bull**** feeding on itself. Hoping for real
science is optimistic...IMHO. G