DGDevin wrote:


"Swingman" wrote in message
...

Let's see some "scientific" refutation, please:


http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/...ut_the_ti.html

Ah yes, The American Thinker, home of Ed Lasky who never met a
smear-tactic
he didn't like. Say, there's a real credible source, right up there with
DailyKOS in terms of believability.

Yep, to the statist progressive, citing facts is considered a smear
tactic. You just threw in that Daily KOS (a site that does *not* deal in
facts, but rather feelings) statement to lend credibility to your smear.

--

There is never a situation where having more rounds is a disadvantage

Rob Leatham