azotic wrote:
"Hawke" wrote in message
...
The fact that some people were acting dishonestly doesn't discredit the
work of literally thousands of honest scientists who all have come to
similar conclusions.
Hawke

Scientists also gave us the eugenics programs last century and
look how well that worked out. As a matter of fact it was a britt
that came up with it, just like now they had lots of data to support
thier ideas all based on scientific reasearch. Fortunatley the GW
advocates got caught this time arround before they could do any
real damage. There were thousands of honest scientists at that time who
believed in and supported eugenics. In fact they were so convincing
they duped politians into passing laws that harmed many people and
caused untold suffering, some folks even died at the hands of these
scientists.

Blind faith in what scientists tell you is dangerious...


Blind faith in anything is dangerous. But who's advocating blind faith
in science? Even the scientists don't do that. Everything in science is
based on theory and is subject to change if there is new evidence. If
down the road all the evidence points to there being no global warming
that is what science will accept. But then, right now all the science
says it is happening. So that's what I'm going with. When the leading
global scientists say the threat of global warming is over and they
misinterpreted the data then I'll gladly accept that. Until then I'll go
with what they are saying the data shows as of now.


Hawke