View Single Post
  #176   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
dennis@home dennis@home is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,369
Default The future of DIY



"Clive George" wrote in message
o.uk...
"dennis@home" wrote in message
...


"Clive George" wrote in message
o.uk...
"dennis@home" wrote in message
...


"Clive George" wrote in message
o.uk...


Way to miss my point. Which would get you the energy for a 10 mile
walk, the box or the cornflakes?

You wouldn't need either for a mere 10 miles.

I'm beginning to side with geoff here...


Poor you.

You must have missed the point where I said goodness rather than
calories.


That's because you didn't say any such thing. Are you getting forgetful?
Google may be able to help you, but I doubt it.


I listed the differences and said the box was probably better for you than
the original cornflakes.


I think there are probably more usable calories in the cornflakes but
that doesn't mean its good for you.


I can think of many situations where it does.


I don't see many people that would starve to death if you deprived them of
their cornflakes.
I am also fairly certain that the basic grains could make better foods for
those that actually need the food.