On Jan 5, 6:49*pm, wrote:
On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 15:41:55 -0600, Tim Daneliuk





wrote:
On 1/5/2010 2:34 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 14:03:46 -0600, Tim Daneliuk
wrote:

On 1/5/2010 1:21 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 13:10:01 -0600, Tim Daneliuk
wrote:

On 1/5/2010 12:53 PM, Robatoy wrote:
On Jan 5, 1:29 pm, Tim Daneliuk wrote:

That, Sparky, IS stealing.

Antagonizing again, Tim. What did Big Bro' Robatoy tell you? It's too
smokey in here. Leave!

Or.....?????

I've already provided you with the calculus to shut me up.

Open Source software = collectivism, socialism, communism.

Dead wrong. *OSS is *voluntary cooperation*. *No one makes you
participate or use the resulting work product. *Rather different
than if the government showed up and said "Every user of vi must
now convert to GNU emacs."

It is still collectivism, socialism and communism. Voluntary or not,
it fits the definition perfectly.

In the context of the political discussion here, the three notions all
include force.

You are a crack pot. That's the only option remaining.

See ya!

By Jove, I think he left. In a Huff! (Ukrainian Fiat product)