View Single Post
  #31   Report Post  
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
Eregon[_4_] Eregon[_4_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 139
Default Opinion of Ruger Mini 14 .223?

Larry Jaques wrote in
:

On Sun, 03 Jan 2010 17:30:14 -0600, the infamous "David R.Birch"
scrawled the following:

Wes wrote:


"Only accurate rifles are interesting."- Col. Townsend Whelen



This thinking led us to fight two World Wars with target rifles
instead of battle rifles and to use squads of riflemen supported by
machine guns instead of the more useful unit of machine guns supported
by riflemen.


Lerps in 'Nam picked up muddy, always-usable AKs and tossed their
early, quick-jamming M-16s. The smart ones also quit smoking and ate
the same fishhead & rice diet the Vietnamese did so their smells were
the same, internally and externally. The M-16 was eventually
debugged, but lots of our guys died from the early models. That was
inexcusable.


The jamming problem was NOT caused by faulty DESIGN but by faulty
AMMUNITION.

The Stoner-designed Armalite was designed to utilize IMR powder and, in
its initial testing and Air Force deployment, served so well that the
brass at the Pentagon decided to adopt it for the other services.

Unfortunately, however, the "geniuses" at the Pentagon preferred doing
business with Winchester rather than Remington and wrote the ammo specs
to require BALL powder in the cartridges. The dustier BALL powder
resulted in both frequent jamming due to powder fouling AND degradation
of bullet performance due to lowered velocities.

While the addition of a "Bolt Assist" helped (somewhat) to overcome the
fouling of the chamber by the dirty powder in the substandard ammunition,
the only "treatment" was frequent cleaning of the firing chamber.

I wonder if the REMF that wrote those specs got his Directorship with the
Olin Corporation when he retired...