Atty Charles Novins Seeks Changes In Law to Protect InnocentsFrom Internet Vandals
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 12:05:49 -0800, Aratzio wrote:
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 09:45:01 -0800 (PST), in the land of news.groups,
Robert Macy got double secret probation for
writing:
Rather than hold those responsible that 'transfer' information without
review, wouldn't it make more sense to hold the ORIGINATORS responsible?
Which means, remove anonymity. Maintain complete tracking capability.
Guess that won't work all the time either, since there are situations
where truth should surface and the person who brings that truth forward
should be protected.
Any ideas how to do all this WITHOUT government intervention? Else,
there'll be a tax to pay for the 'service' of policing the 'net.
How about we do it the easy way:
1. those who are functionally incapable of not reading that which upsets
them, leave the interwebs.
2. those who require that all messages be to their liking, move to a
moderated web board.
3. those who feel they need to control the words of others, ****
themselves with a spintered wooden spoon, then leave.
The rest of us that have a modicum of common sense will remain.
IAWTP.
|