It does become hard to differentiate sales promotion at the cost of other
product bashing from honest testing and reporting, whatever that is...LOL

I believe it was that same report that brought in LED lighting as a similiar
problem as fluorescent spectrums. I wouldn't have believed that lighting
spectrum balance was so important but as I age I find myself very affected
by lighting, particularly SADS type responses due to lack of sunlight.


"Don Klipstein" wrote in message
...
In article , Josepi wrote:
The whole document appears to me to be a fluorescent-bashing BS set of
half-truths.

In fact, most health claims related to 460 nm from advocates of
full-spectrum lamps are that non-full-spectrum fluorescents do not produce
enough in the 460 nm area (which most white LEDs do produce a lot of).

As it turns out, CFLs do not produce a lot of ultraviolet, in fact
much less than is present in an equivalent amount of daylight that has
passed through a glass window. CFLs produce more UV than incandescents
do, but still little.

- Don Klipstein )