View Single Post
  #373   Report Post  
Posted to alt.home.repair,rec.woodworking
[email protected] clare@snyder.on.ca is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 18,538
Default Chrysler engines

On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 13:05:22 -0600, Jules
wrote:

On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 11:07:22 -0600, krw wrote:
Definitely downhill on serviceability, but thankfully they require a
lot less.

Yes, but they make up for it by often costing a small fortune when
something *does* go wrong...


Not so much now. It's not like the '80s with the GM "computer
controlled" carburetors. I had to replace all of the spark coils (two
at a time - they wouldn't replace them all the first time) on the '00
Sable. It was a couple of hundred each time, but that's not so bad.


Well, I suppose a lot of the cost these days is in the labor to fix it, so
if you can do stuff yourself you save a lot - but the parts on more modern
vehicles that do go wrong always seem to be more complicated and therefore
more expensive to me.

... plus I like keeping it simple; if something does go wrong when I'm
out in the middle of nowhere, there's more chance I can fix it by the
roadside in an older vehicle than a modern one. I like that safety and
convenience.


The more chance you'll have to. I *like* fuel injection and all of
that. The only repairs I've ever had to make to a fuel injection system
was a leaking distribution rail in my Vision and that was under a
(silent) recall.


I have issues with any computer-controlled stuff, though. If it was
accessible, they gave me full schematics and a copy of the firmware then I
wouldn't mind; I can fix it myself if it does break. But I really don't
like stuff that's "black boxed" like that and considered not to be field
servicable.

Agreed on the "mechanical" side of FI, though - definitely better than a
carb (although I've stripped and restored a few carbs now and they're not
too bad and *should* work for a long time before they next need to be
messed with).

My '78 Granada went through at least a carb a year.


How come? Was that a known bad design, or was something else causing the
failure (the fuel used, lack of fuel line filter etc.)? I suppose it does
matter how many miles you were putting on it, but I'd expect a good carb
to go for close on 100k miles before needing major surgery.


Terrible carb, and most of the "rebuilts" were even worse.
(I'm starting to feel sorry for all these woodworking folk putting up with
this thread :-)

cheers

Jules