View Single Post
  #365   Report Post  
Posted to alt.home.repair,rec.woodworking
[email protected] clare@snyder.on.ca is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 18,538
Default Chrysler engines

On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 10:35:09 -0600, The Daring Dufas
wrote:

Nate Nagel wrote:
Ed Pawlowski wrote:
"ktos" wrote in message
...
My next door neighbor has 2 Chryslers. Both cars sound like bombs
exploding when they start their cars.


I can still remember back in the 50's hearing our neighbor start his
'56 Dodge. It was a godawful sound very fitting for such an ugly car.
Remember the three-tone paint jobs available back then? Most every
maker had two-tone, but Dodge had to top them with three.

Over the past 48 years, I've owned many different brands of car, but
never anything from Chrysler. Nor will I ever. I still don't like
their style.


Were they using gear reduction starters that early?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z_2OBC2d93g

that's a GOOD sound!

nate




The Mopar gear reduction starters drew a lot less current from
the battery if I remember correctly. A low battery would start
a Dart with a slant six but wouldn't start a Falcon with a six.

TDD

A gear reduction starter on a HEMI drew lwss power than a six cyl
Falcon!! And the Ford moveable shoe type starters needed a good
battery and excellent connections, or they wouldn't even TRY to crank.