"Roger Chapman" wrote in message
...

1."The temperature anomaly for 2008 was not statistically significantly
different from 1987."

Conveniently ignoring the fact that all the other years from 2000 onwards
including 2009 are.

That would be the one that the MET office doesn't think was as warm as NASA
does.


2 "And still the conclusion is that no one knows because the changes
argued about would take thousands of years to raise sea levels
discernibly."

Funny that those on the other side are predicting sea level rises of
noticeable size by the end of the century and, depending on what exactly
he was on about, are already reporting significant rises in sea level due
to expansion as the seas warm.

Facts? not from wiki though.