On Dec 11, 11:16*am, Larry Blanchard wrote:
On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 22:50:40 -0700, Mark & Juanita wrote:
*That's the point at which I became a former subscriber. *The irony was
that they had some very interesting columns prior to that describing
what they termed "math abuse" *-- the manipulation of statistics and
selective presentation (e.g. selective use of scale, smoothing, etc) to
guide a preferred interpretation of the data.

AFAIK, they're still peer-reviewed articles. *So there must be a lot of
people in on the conspiracy :-).

Using the same cooked datasets you'd expect to have some consensus.
Even here they have to censor anyone who isn't a member of the
orthodoxy. Consensus, my ass.