Roger 'Wikipedia' Chapman wrote:
The Medway Moron wrote:

snip


So, you've lost the argument then?

An argument in which you haven't made any attempt to adduce a single
fact and have displayed an appalling level of ignorance into the
bargain. Don't be silly.

So far in this argument you have made unsubstantiated claims about man made
climate change. When challenged you have ignored several pertinant
questions, then evaded the issue, then claimed you have answered several
questions when you haven't.

I'll remind you, the burden of proof is on the proponent of the argument.

You started off by becoming Mr Angry when a reasoned polite reply to
Dennis's post was all that was required. By your fourth post you were
raving like a madman and had started throwing insults about.

You have frequently abused anyone challenging your opinions by calling them
mavericks, deniers, lunatics, nutters & more recently sceptics. Your only
answer when challenged is to refer to Wikipedia pages that are at best
dubious in their accuracy and almost certainly biased.

When its become obvious you are losing the argument you have become abusive
and resorted to ad hominem attacks and pathetic attempts to insult people.

Its obvious you have never learnt to think for yourself.

******.

Talking about yourself again I see.

A prime example of your behavior. Unable to answer any of the questions
raised you resort to abuse. The equivilant to the schoolboy "no you" retort.
Very clever. You obviously lack the intellectual capacity to even insult
people properly.

What a sad gullible idiot you are..


--
Dave - The Medway Handyman
www.medwayhandyman.co.uk