Roger Chapman wrote:
The Medway Handyman wrote:

"Each of the three global temperature centres uses different
observation sets, although there are large overlaps in the
information used. Each centre also has its own methods for
checking and processing data, as well as for making the final
calculation."
And they still ****ed up & got different years?

You really are the most ignorant of idiots but do keep on
digging. You are providing a certain level of amusement.
Your verbal diarrhoea is no substitute for rational thought.
And neither is you being a complete ****wit, but there you are.
You could of course try and provide some authoritative support for
the pseudo scientific garbage you peddle but no, all you ever do is
spout insults and then whinge when you get some of your own
medicine in return.

How about http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/******

That is very much your style. Nothing there about global warming, or
the scientific method, or statistical analysis. Just a description of
yourself as others see you.

So thats ner ner ne ner ner then is it?

Can you not see what a **** you are making of yourself?


All you have done in this thread (and elsewhere) is display an
appalling level of ignorance about the scientific method and any
evidence put forward. But keep on digging. There is still a chance
you can make your personal situation even worse.

I think you will find its you looking like a looser, since you can't
answer a straight question.

I answered the question twice. That you can't see it just makes you
The Medway Moron.

OK then ****wit, either tell me the date & time of the posts, repost your
reply, or shut the **** up.

Posting a link to a Wikipedia page IS NOT answering the question.


--
Dave - The Medway Handyman
www.medwayhandyman.co.uk