in 245393 20091209 220257 "dennis@home" wrote:
"Roger Chapman" wrote in message
...
Man at B&Q wrote:

What's different about AGW?

The huge amount of compelling evidence.

I would call it circumstantial, rather than compelling.

It is compelling enough to have persuaded most governments to take AGW
seriously. (Even China).

But not Australia any more.

They have decided it isn't worth the effort.

"they" being a couple of politicians who consider planning for the future to be a
waste of money - but I bet they have a pension plan.