View Single Post
  #127   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
Roger Chapman Roger Chapman is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,081
Default BBC jakes GW demo?

dennis@home wrote:

Yes its so easy that you keep posting stuff that is irrelevant.
you obviously don't know what they mean or you wouldn't post them.


That you don't find the cites relevant says a good deal more about you
than it does about me, particularly when you don't come up with any
cites of your own.


What is there to cite?


Something to back up what you say.

I said there is energy in the atmosphere that doesn't increase its
temperature and you post irrelevant stuff about temperatures.
That says a lot about you BTW.


Remember this from up thread:

**********************************

Or to look at it another way, if the atmosphere is warmer there will
be more energy in it. That after all is the only reason it is warmer.


There is a lot of energy in the atmosphere that is does not increase its
temperature.
The energy does, however, drive storms.

*********************************

ISTM that the nature of temperature is relevant.

If you want to put forward the curious notion that a warmer atmosphere
will not be more energetic then you do need some convincing evidence.
That you would have great difficulty in finding any evidence at all, let
alone any convincing evidence, is the real reason why there are no cites
to back you up.