"rangerssuck" wrote in message
...
On Dec 9, 12:06 am, Ned Simmons wrote:
On Tue, 08 Dec 2009 23:04:36 -0500, Joseph Gwinn

wrote:
In article , Pete Snell wrote:

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=seven-answers-to-cli...

Given that the title of the article claims that opposition is contrarian
nonsense, a balanced presentation seems unlikely. This appears to be a
polemic, versus a scientific paper. And Scientific American (which I
read for decades, from age 16, until it got too gee-whiz for me) is a
popular magazine, not an academic journal. I think I'll pass.

Yes, let's continue to rely on the WSJ editorial page for a balanced
presentation.

--
Ned Simmons

You're kidding, right? Just like Fox News is "fair and balanced"
**************************************

In comparison to the State-run, Drive-by networks?