Roger Chapman wrote:
The Medway Handyman wrote:

snip

Phils question was delightfully simple, I'll re post it so you can't
ignore it;

"If it was first noticed 100 years ago, it's fairly safe to say that
it had been occuring for centuries before that, so how is it
mankind's fault, when the world population 300 - 400 years ago was a
tiny fraction of what it is now, and virtually none of them used
fossil fuels?" Got any answers ****wit?

With every post you get further and further into insanity. Phil got an
answer and hasn't come back again. If I had ignored it Phil wouldn't
have got that answer.

Phil did not get an answer, he got a referal to a Wikipedia page, no doubt
written by another ecoboloxist like you.

You can churn out as many lies as you like but none of them alter the
reality or the fact that you are a clueless idiot who doesn't
understand the first thing about science.

And nothing can alter the fact that you are evading the issue completely and
are incapable of answering the simplest of questions.

Any post that questions your opinion is either refered to a Wikipedia page
or met with abuse and name calling.

Anyone with a different opinion is a denier, a maverick, clueless, or a
lunatic.

If you were able to answer a simple question you might make your point, as
it is you are a complete ****wit.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/******


--
Dave - The Medway Handyman
www.medwayhandyman.co.uk