On Tue, 08 Dec 2009 23:04:36 -0500, Joseph Gwinn
wrote:

In article , Pete Snell wrote:



http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=seven-answers-to-climate-contrarian-nonsense

Given that the title of the article claims that opposition is contrarian
nonsense, a balanced presentation seems unlikely. This appears to be a
polemic, versus a scientific paper. And Scientific American (which I
read for decades, from age 16, until it got too gee-whiz for me) is a
popular magazine, not an academic journal. I think I'll pass.

Yes, let's continue to rely on the WSJ editorial page for a balanced
presentation.

--
Ned Simmons