Roger Chapman wrote:
The Medway Handyman wrote:

snip

It doesn't seem to matter to TMH whether the science is dumbed down
or not. Either way he doesn't understand it.

More proof of that below.

snip

'Deniers' and 'Lunacy'? The facts of the matter are that the green
tree hugger pressure groups have created an industry devoted to
proving that (a) global warming actually exists and (b) that it is
caused by man made CO2 emissions.

I suspect that the real fact of this particular matter is that TMH
is a clueless idiot.

Whats your ****ing problem Mr Angry?

Talking to yourself? But please keep on digging.

As I've already said, you are not necessarily right and being a tree
hugger doens't give you the moral high ground.

There are some things I am right about and many things I am probably
right about. The things I am right about include the fact that the
greenhouse effect is real and that CO2 is a greenhouse gas both of
which you claim contradict plain old common sense.

Sorry, I'm right when I say its bollox. There, simple isn't? Just say you
are right and it is so.

An as for being a tree hugger. Don't make me laugh. I have lost count
of the number of times one of my neighbours has asked how can I sleep
at night after I have cut down another tree. Perhaps you missed my
reference somewhere up thread (or in the related thread) about the
green meanies.

Neither of which have been conclusively proven & both of which
contradict plain old common sense.

Sad that TMH is totally lacking in plain old common sense. The
mainstream scientific view is very much that global warming is
happening and that man made CO2 is playing a part.

The mainstream evidence? Oh, is that like the conclusive evidence
that the hole in the ozone level was going to kill us all?

The hole in the ozone layer plays only a minor part in global warming
and I think you will find it has the opposite effect to that which
might be expected.

I couldn't care less what part it has in global warning. The point is the
green tosers sold us all on the fact that 'we are all doomed' Capt
Mainwaring & nothing happened. In fact it repaired itself, but they kept
quiet about that slightly embarrassing fact & swept the idea under the
carpet.

Caught out crying wolf.


The mainstream evidence in the 40 articles published by the BBC?
(Thanks Matty F).

The BBC is a purveyor of news, not science.

The BBC reports science it doesn't generate the content.


The underlying body of
science is vast and there are only a few maverick scientists prepared
to dispute even parts of it.

So if they dispute it they are 'mavericks' and their opinion isn't valid
then?

Reminds me of the lung cancer
controversy back in the 50s when the tobacco companies fought tooth
and nail to prove that there was no connection between their product
and lung cancer.

No **** sherlock. None of the UK petrol companies seem to be making much
fuss do they?

Your incredible arrogance in calling them 'presumptions' is just
that & doesn't give you the moral high ground or make you right.
I was being generous. Saying that CO2 isn't a greenhouse gas or the
greenhouse effect doesn't exist are bare faced lies. Neither claim
has any basis in fact.

Sorry to say not eveyone agrees with green bollox. You appear to
have swallowed it whole.

As I have said before the green house effect and CO2 being a
greenhouse gas are both established fact. That you are prepared to go
on denying such facts makes you a laughing stock but doesn't alter
the said facts.

They are only established facts in your deluded imagination.

SNIP DRIVEL

'Green' has two meanings; Environmentally aware or extremely
gullible.
Only two? Aren't you forgetting something vitally important?

No, only one meaning in your case - extremely gullible.

Surely it would be obvious to anyone but a complete idiot that the
primary meaning of Green is as a colour.

Only a complete idiot would be as gullible as you are.


--
Dave - The Medway Handyman
www.medwayhandyman.co.uk