Buerste wrote:

"Joseph Gwinn" wrote in message
...
I just came upon this article. Probably the best fallout so far from
the leaked emails is that now *all* the raw data will be published,
allowing a full evaluation to be performed by all sides. From this
scrum, something like truth may emerge. What will also emerge is some
idea what we do and do not in fact really know.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/cop...-confe/6678469
/Climategate-University-of-East-Anglia-U-turn-in-climate-change-row.html

The Telegraph (a major UK newspaper), 28 November 2009.

Joe Gwinn

I'll still not trust the data, it's tainted. And, who's to say that
temps weren't taken in heat islands and/or gathered with extreme bias
and tampered with. How much **** does it take to ruin a bowl of ice cream?



"This is being sold as a dose of castor oil you have to swallow
and it's just not true."

Bill Clinton, former U.S. president,,
on selling climate change as an economic opportunity

http://www.reuters.com/