On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 14:09:42 -0700, D Yuniskis
wrote:

Hi,

I don't have anything other than "gut feel" to resort to
as evidence but it sure *seems* like most UPS designs
EAT batteries!

We rarely have outages here. So, there is no real
draw on the batteries in our UPS's. So, they should just
be on float charges.

Yet, the batteries seem to wear out far too frequently, IMO.

I could possibly understand regular outages cycling the
batteries too deeply.

That's not what kills most UPS batteries.

And, chargers too aggressively
replenishing them (after all, a UPS that quits because its
battery wasn't fully recharged earns a bad reputation for
its manufacturer).

That, but also an unreasonably high float voltage, is what kills them.
We've seen literally dozens of UPS' from assorted manufacturers with
failed batteries - baked dry, swollen, cracked cases. On fitting new
batteries and checking the charger behaviour, we note that the
recovery charge rate is definitely "too aggressive" (motive onvious)
and the eventual float charge voltage was definitely destined to kill
the cells within a year or so.

The only time we were happy that the cells were within the
manufacturer approved envelope was ... on DISCHARGE.

But, I can't see how even periodic
battery tests (performed by the UPS itself) could be the
problem -- unless there is something wrong with the
approach being used?

Can anyone with firsthand knowledge shed some light on this?
I.e., what *is* the UPS doing to/with the battery when it
is not being used to supply the load?