Meat Plow wrote:

On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 19:24:02 -0500, Jamie
wrote:


Michael A. Terrell wrote:


Jamie wrote:


Michael A. Terrell wrote:


PeterD wrote:



On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:38:47 -0700, D Yuniskis
wrote:




This is how GFCI breakers work -- they watch for current "leaking"
off to ground someplace other than in the "return" conductor.

No they don't. They look for imbalanced current flow between the two
conductors.



How are you going to get the imbalance without some current finding
another path to the neutral conductor, which is bonded to the grounding
system at the main panel? You two are describing the same thing, from
different directions.



I know that you can be bond headed at times, but really, this is simple
101 Electronics..

D Yuniskis has it all over you. It's obvious that he knows more about
the subject than you.

Btw.
CLUE:
The neutral also passes through the fault device.

Think before depressing the SEND Button!



Take your own advice, Jamie. You've been told on multiple newsgroups
how GFCI interrupters work, yet still claim they can't be used on two
wire outlets. I posted a link to a Leviton GFCI datasheet, and gave you
the NEC code numbers stating that they are allowed on two wire circuits.
Your reading comprehension is barely third grade level, and dropping.
Your are a typical 'lid' ham radio operator.

You are just a knuckle dragging moron who likes to troll. Go back to
writing your crappy software and leave electronics to people who know
what they are doing. There is no hope for you to ever make a post that
makes sense.



What a putz, you couldn't win a valid argument even if you were correct,
and that isn't vary often.

You're so far out of your element, the closes you can get is when
you go buy one, from Honda.


You know your silly ****ing match could be more valid if the content
leaned slightly towards being correct in the grammar department.

Ok:
Push button B:

Results : Explosion;
Review : Why didn't we select Button A:?

Answer From Upper management:

Because we didn't like the grammar
for the description of operation per button A:, even though, we
clearly understood it and knew it was the correct choice.

Final results of report:
Its clearly the fault of BUTTON A:, because the author didn't
use grammar acceptable for our taste and there for, we concluded
the data not credible.

So as usual. Upper management seems to find a way to **** on those
that actually have the real answers.

The old saying goes, when looking up, all you see is assholes.

This concludes that for the moment, it must also apply here.

And let us not forget:

BUTTON A:
will be acceptable after upper management has edited it to their
version, resulting in the same answer and thus taking full credit
for it later on.

Yes, I've seen and worked with many like this... The world is full of
them.
What will these idiots, yes, mentally deficient, do when the so
called, illiterate, that actually knows something go away and leave the
upper management choking in their own vile of vomit.