"Steve W." wrote in message
...
wrote:
On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 08:52:22 -0800, Gunner Asch
wrote:

On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 18:32:52 +0700, wrote:

On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 20:22:01 -0800, Gunner Asch
wrote:

On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 08:00:35 +0700, wrote:

On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 14:11:20 -0800, Gunner Asch
wrote:

On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 16:49:41 -0500, Ned Simmons
wrote:

On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 12:52:20 -0800, Gunner Asch
wrote:
.
Conclusion:
When Obama went to Pakistan in 1981 he was traveling either with a
British passport or an Indonesian passport.
Imagine my surprise that Snopes has seen this as well...
http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/passport.asp

So which passport did he use?

Gunner

A far more interesting question is: "If there is even a tiny chance
that you are correct why has there not been a concentrated effort by
the Republican Party to obtain this information?"

One would tend to believe that if it were possible to prove that an
election of a Democrat President was fraudulently that the
Republicans
would want it publicized. Wouldn't one?

Have any idea how many times this question has been brought to court
so
far?

33 times

And it never ever goes to trial or a jury.

Democrats make sure to put up such a fuss...that it is tossed out of
court. generally without "prejudice"...which means it can be opened
again.

And when it is...its again tossed without prejudice..and then again
and
again.

Seems no court wants to be the one to upset the apple cart..or be the
first one to find a president there illegally.

Must scare the **** out any judge put in that position.

Gunner

Regards,

J.B.
Do you really believe all this conspiracy stuff? Do you really believe
that there is not a single judge somewhere in this Brave Land, elected
in a good strong Republican jurisdiction (so he doesn't have to worry
about next year), that would hear the case?

Do you really believe that not only the Republican National Committee,
to say nothing of the Democratic National Committee and those
political neophytes, the Clintons, are somehow partners in a cover up?

Or do you believe it just might be possible that the reason the courts
haven't disqualified the President is because there isn't any
evidence, that will stand the light of day, to support these fantastic
theories.

Regards,

J.B.
Time will tell eh. So when will Obama release his original Birth Cert
and his school records?

So far..they are locked securely away from the People.

Any idea why that is?

Hummmm?

Gunner

My understanding is that Obama's birth certificate has been physically
inspected and appears legitimate and that the applicable agency in
Hawaii has certified that it is a normal, legal birth certificate.

What more is there to do?

School records? Didn't he attend Harvard University? Or are you
referring to the "Moslem School" that he went to in Indonesia, which
everyone just knows is a "Moslem country", right?

You will note the inverted commas I hope.

Regards,

J.B.


*AP declared Obama “Kenyan-Born”*



(The Post & Email)

What most people know is that the Associated Press (AP) is one of the
largest, internationally recognized, syndicated news services. What
most people don’t know that is in 2004, the AP was a “birther” news
organization.

How so? Because in a syndicated report, published Sunday, June 27,
2004, by the Kenyan Standard Times, and which was, as of this report,
available at

http://web.archive.org/web/200406271...ws26060403.htm

More lies. Don't you know how to use Snopes, Steve?

http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/birthers/ap.asp

--
Ed Huntress