NJH wrote:
"trotsky" wrote in message
...


Jerry McG wrote:

And why would there be? Who wants to be detained indefinitely without

access to attorneys because you've done something the administration

doesn't

like?

Yeah, like planning to blow up innocents,


How many innocents were killed by the U.S. as "collateral damage"?


Probably fewer than by Clinton in his 81-day round-the-clock bombing of
Serbia,


Oh, so that makes killing and dismembering children permissible? Hell,
at least people working in the WTC were largely adults.


a country which neither did nor intended any harm to the U.S., did
not support terrorism, had no weapons of mass destruction or plans to build
any, and had invaded no other country. Nor did Clinton's war accomplish a
single thing. After he'd finished spending billions and exhausting our
supply of cruise missiles, Milosevich was still there.


Sure, there's no analogy between Milosevich and Hussein. Apparently
what's good for the goose isn't good for the gander.


Well, his war did get Monica Lewinsky off the front pages. I suppose that is
an accomplishment of sorts.


She would never have been there if the Republicans didn't have Ken Starr
go on his witch hunt.