"DerbyDad03" wrote in message
...
On Nov 12, 11:31 am, "John D99" wrote:
"DerbyDad03" wrote in message

...
On Nov 11, 8:51 pm, "John D99" wrote:





"DerbyDad03" wrote in message

...
On Nov 11, 6:20 pm, "John D99" wrote:

"DerbyDad03" wrote in message

...
On Nov 11, 4:34 pm, "John D99" wrote:
...snip...

Are your kids going to search out books that promote
homosexuality?

===
They might very well search them out.
==

Interesting response.

==
In what way? You asked if my kids were going to search them out and
I
simply answered that they might. A pretty uninteresting response if
you ask me.
===
It was "interesting" becasue you said your kids "might very well
search
them out", refering to books that promote homosexuality.

==
Yep, that's what I said and I still claim it's a pretty uninteresting
response.
==

Yeah, I see you *say* that.

I think most of us are concerned about what our kids are exposed to,
and
taught or coached into thinking is normal.

Kids who grow up in alcoholic familes are much more at risk of beoming
alcoholics themselves. Same for drugs.

Many pedophiles were themselves victims of pedophilia.

It's best to keep kids aware that alcoholism, drug addicition,
pedophilia
and homosexuality are not natural things, but nevertheless behavior
that
people fall into.

Some catholic priest once said: "give me the boy when he is seven and
I
will
give you the man".

The hitler youth and the soviet kommsomols recognized the same.

snip some routine rationalizations

==
I wonder...do you ever go back a read what you write? Do you ever
notice that most of the time you completely ignore the points being
made by the person you are responding to?
==
You don't make points. You just pretend that whatever kids exposed to is
ok,
and mention stuff about homosexual ducks that you raise...

==
Thank you proving my point once again.
==


It's just that you and daiOH have so much in common.

==
You've offered a lame excuse instead of admitting your error.
==

Bull****. Do you expect anyone to take you seriously when you try to pretend
that questionable mateiral on TV is the same as kids searching up books in
the library?

How many kids books have homosexual material interjected into them? Would
they ever get read? And when they do, there often are groups that come
forward to complain.

Common sense would tell most people, that most kids don't read much of
anything - that sit in front of TVs watching whatever garbage is presented
to them and that your argument has been false, stupid and diversionary from
the start.

Try interjecting messages on TV programs that put wife beating, pedophilia,
nazism, bestialiy in a good light, and see how many groups start raising
hell - becasue they know what people, especially kids, see over and over on
TV does influence them.

Run along.