On Nov 11, 6:20*pm, "John D99" wrote:
"DerbyDad03" wrote in message

...
On Nov 11, 4:34 pm, "John D99" wrote:
...snip...





Are your kids going to search out books that promote homosexuality?

===
They might very well search them out.
==

Interesting response.

==
In what way? You asked if my kids were going to search them out and I
simply answered that they might. A pretty uninteresting response if
you ask me.
===
It was "interesting" becasue you said your kids "might very well search
them out", refering to books that promote homosexuality.

==
Yep, that's what I said and I still claim it's a pretty uninteresting
response.
==

Yeah, I see you *say* that.

I think most of us are concerned about what our kids are exposed to, and
taught or coached into thinking is normal.

Kids who grow up in alcoholic familes are much more at risk of beoming
alcoholics themselves. Same for drugs.

Many pedophiles were themselves victims of pedophilia.

It's best to keep kids aware that alcoholism, drug addicition, pedophilia
and homosexuality are not natural things, but nevertheless behavior that
people fall into.

Some catholic priest once said: "give me the boy when he is seven and I will
give you the man".

The hitler youth and the soviet kommsomols recognized the same.

snip some routine rationalizations

I wonder...do you ever go back a read what you write? Do you ever
notice that most of the time you completely ignore the points being
made by the person you are responding to? Do you notice that you tend
spin what is said towards whatever direction you want your post to go?

You take illogical steps in helter-skelter directions, you don't
respond to key points and you ask questions that aren't even relevant
to the discussion.

Some examples...

I say my kids might search for a book and you respond by implying I'm
not concerned about my children.

I point out that there are same sex couples raising kids and you ask
me if I'm a homosexual.

I ask for stats on a claim you made about the "average father" and you
ignore the question, yet when someone else makes a claim you ask "Do
you have scientific studies to back the premise?" Why is that question
OK for you to ask, but ignored when asked of you? (Don't bother
answering...I really don't care.)

To paraphrase Maxwell Smart, it's the old "instead of admitting I'm
wrong, I'll just change the subject" trick.

Please pass my sympathies along to your kids...the influence you have
had on them must be very painful.