On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 10:55:54 -0500, flipper wrote:

On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 06:53:59 -0700, Archimedes' Lever
wrote:

On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 23:07:41 -0500, flipper wrote:

http://realestate.findlaw.com/trespa...ng-basics.html

"There are both criminal and civil trespass laws....
Civil trespass requires that the landowner initiate a private
enforcement action in court to collect any damages for which the
trespasser may be responsible (regardless of whether a crime has been
committed)."


You do know that laws vary from state to state, and this site's blanket
definitions may not be true in all states.

Yes, I know they vary but, while I don't know for a fact, I suspect
the basics are similar because the problem is similar.

I also suspect the idea came from his lawyer which, having been
charged, I presume he's retained.

Look. Trespass is a crime. That means that IF it has been committed,
the authorities are obligated to site the offender.

A civil judge and jury will laugh at you for taking someone to court
for trespass, if not one goddamned piece of property was damaged or
removed.

And IF something was damaged or removed, the authorities will be
adding other criminal charges to the person's list.

No harm, no foul is what they will declare, and it likely will not even
make it to ANY hearing.

Make more sense now?

Common sense is something that lacks seriously in a society that hunts
up the meaning of something on the net with EVERY encounter they have
because their life was so fruitless that they garnered no knowledge as
they came up in the world. You hunt it up, and think you know all about
it, yet your lack of common sense makes it glaringly apparent that you
not only know nothing about it now, but likely NEVER DID.

'flipper' fits you, because you flip through web sites thinking you know
all about the world from the crap you get there and using the crap in
your skull to filter and retain it. You would fail miserably in a
Jeopardy show, because there are no live search engines.