View Single Post
  #16   Report Post  
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
Joseph Gwinn Joseph Gwinn is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,966
Default Upcoming Rock Island Arsenal sale

In article ,
Ignoramus32280 wrote:

On 2009-10-17, Joseph Gwinn wrote:
How about a conviction for making false statements to the police?

Not sure what your question is in regards to this, but I would not
want to make any false statements on those forms.


The classic solution is to hand write in ink a statement on the form
that you no longer have the records for or possession of the item in
question having sold it on, or the like, and that at purchase no EUL was
requested. Be sure to give the dates of purchase and sale, if known.
This way, the form as signed is not false.


I tried this, they did not accept the forms, at which point I sort of
gave up.


That is their intent. But if they really had the power they claim, they
would not need your signature.


I also thought that there was a small chance that it was some
sort of a sneaky tactic to make me incriminate myself in some way.


OK. But keep good records. Such as a xerox copy of their
identification. Looking prepared has a way of deflecting trouble.


It doesn't matter if their database has no way to handle this, or any
other such excuse, as the legal copy is the piece of paper with the
original signature. It's also useful to annotate and sign in blue ink,
so the difference from the printed text is obvious, as are ordinary
xerox copies.


If only.


If only what?


There is a parallel while selling a house. One of the many forms I was
asked to sign was one saying that there was no UFFI or asbestos in the
house. I balked, saying that while I had no reason to believe that
either substance was present, without tearing all the walls open for
inspection I had no way to attest to any such thing. So I initially
declined to sign the form. I don't recall which house this was, but I
recall signing at least one such form after adding a "to the best of my
knowledge" qualifier. This same qualifier is on all the lead-paint
disclaimers, so there already was legal precedent.


This is very sensible.


My lawyer agreed as well. The form actually came from the buyer's real
estate agent and her firm, not the buyer, and the agent and firm were
not going to blow the sale for this. Most real estate firms in the area
do not ask that sellers sign any such thing, so there were ready
alternatives.


Joe Gwinn