"Scott Lurndal" wrote in message
.. .
"HeyBub" writes:
DGDevin wrote:

What cracks me up is folks upset at the notion of some govt.
bureaucrat telling them which sort of health care they'll be allowed
to have as if the same damn thing doesn't happen today with insurance
company bureaucrats. I had an MRI awhile back and the hospital
wouldn't give me an appointment until they'd heard from the insurance
company. Ditto with appointments with specialists and so on, it all
requires approval from some guy in a cubicle a thousand miles away.

[...]

Here's the difference: If you don't like the way your insurance company
treats you - and your observation tends to imply that direction - you're
free to change insurance companies!

No, you're not.

First, many employers only offer one choice.

Second, non-employer sponsored plans will cost the employee much, much
more than the employer sponsored plan; and the employee may not be able
to afford it (note that the current figure for the average family employer
plan is $13k per year between the employer and employee for premiums).

scott

one changes insurance companies by changing employers, if it's that
important to the person. if it's a government 'insurance' company, i would
suppose one would have to emmigrate to change.

no one said either would be easy or have drawbacks.