On Mon, 21 Sep 2009 18:55:56 +0100, Norman Wells wrote:

but still no-one will state the definition _they_ use of something so basic and
fundamental as 'mass'.

This definition has been repeated in different forms numerous times, but
you are such a troll that you refuse to accept that is what the accepted
defintion of mass is.

For example, on Friday, September 18th, 2009 at 17:35:42 +0000 (UTC)
in message ,

"Mass is the quantity of inertia possessed by an object."

Yet you continue to use the defintion for amount of substance as the
definition of mass.