Dave Liquorice wrote:
On Fri, 18 Sep 2009 18:08:26 +0100, Norman Wells wrote:

Sorry Norman, very deeply sorry that you haven't the brain and
certainly not the patience and humility to even begin to understand
even Newtonian physics..let alone anything else.

I understand them very well, thank you.

Trouble is Newtonian physics, as a model, doesn't fit modern
observations. Einstien came up with the General and Special Theories
of Relativity, they fit a a bit better. Then along comes Quantum
Mechanics which, as has already being pointed out, doesn't fit with
Relativity. Both models do fit the observations so as they don't
support each other they both must be "wrong" somewhere. Hence the
current quest for The Grand Unified Theory.

Norman, I suggest you wander off and do some in depth reading about
the advancements in the scientific theories relating to Quantum
Mechanics that have taken place in the last 30+ years. You appear to
be stuck in the theories of 50+ years ago.

Unfortunately that won't help at all with situations that don't involve
quantum mechanics in the slightest.

The physics of sub-atomic particles has no relevance unless you're
considering sub-atomic particles. Winding a cuckoo clock doesn't.