In article , J G Miller
writes
On Thu, 17 Sep 2009 21:12:14 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

isn't it 2.7 absolute or summat?

Sounds about right.

Doesn't that depend on the final volume of the universe, which in turn
depends on the unresolved question of whether the universe is concave,
convex or flat. Most recent measurements suggest it is nearly flat, but
the error in those measurements isn't enough to conclude that it won't
collapse to a singularity again.
--
Kennedy
Yes, Socrates himself is particularly missed;
A lovely little thinker, but a bugger when he's ****ed.
Python Philosophers (replace 'nospam' with 'kennedym' when replying)