Jeff Lawrence wrote:
On Sep 9, 3:11 pm, JohnB wrote:

... which may just be that too many people are trying to make 2 + 2
equal 5.

It's hard to take these conspiracists seriously when they keep coming
up with arguments like this one about the plane wreckage. Arguments
that have been easily been shown to be ridiculous time and time again.
Even now this Yeti is trying to make out that there were no parts
found outside the Pentagon when there are many photos disproving this,
which have been around since just after the incident happened. Or that
certain things shouldn't have happened the way they did when there is
no way of knowing exactly what should or shouldn't have happened
because such things have never happened before. The only way to know
for sure would be to build an exact replica of the towers, crash an
exact replica of the plane into them in exact the same way and see
what happens.
Cheers
Jeff

What parts were found outside the pentagon?

Given the size of the hole - how did the other parts make it INSIDE?

Actually - there is some evidence (anecdotal, like most on both sides of
this case) that the WTC was suceptable to fire damage - firstly, it was
built with central beams with concrete covered trusses in between them
and the outer sides (firefighter's motto - never trust a truss).

Secondly, there is video footage of an inspection of the trusses in the
towers from years before - showing several areas where the fire
retardant on them was either inadequate or non existant.

Like I said - I don't have the answers - just there's plenty of things
that don't add up.