"Larry Jaques" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 4 Sep 2009 17:33:11 -0400, the infamous "Ed Huntress"
scrawled the following:


"Steve Ackman" wrote in message
.org...
In , on Fri, 4 Sep 2009
16:34:25 -0400,
Ed Huntress, wrote:

"Steve Ackman" wrote in message
rg...
In , on Fri, 04 Sep 2009
06:50:02 -0700, Larry Jaques, novalidaddress@di wrote:

snip

Anyway, the only threat was a veiled "We're out here, Mr. & Mrs.
Politician, and we're getting awfully antsy with your actions of
late.
Please stay in line and heed our wishes, Mr. Public Servant, or we'll
have to steer you with a firmer hand."

That probably is the way most people would interpret
it. Apparently in Ed's world, such a message falls
outside the 1st Amendment.

Actually, making a threat to shoot people, which is exactly what Larry
and
you are proposing, is against the law everywhere. That isn't First
Amendment
problems you're facing, it's jail time.

A rifle slung on your back, muzzle down, is not
threatening to shoot anybody... no matter how many
times you say it is. I might add, Period!

Of course not. We're talking about the discussion that you and Larry are
making here.

The threat you and Larry are making is to use the "cartridge box." Larry
wants to carry guns to remind politicians that he'll shoot and kill them
if
he doesn't like what they do, and you agree.

Correct?

You're so full of ****, Ed. Mrs. Brady deserves you.

The only question, based on your own words, was whether you're thinking
about threatening politicians yourself, or if you'd be "glad" if other
people did it.

Now you've answered the question. Are you going to pass out the cartridge
boxes or just watch?

--
Ed Huntress