On Fri, 04 Sep 2009 01:23:12 -0500, cavelamb
wrote:

Ed Huntress wrote:

Of course not. The whole point was the *situation* in which those characters
were carrying. It was the proximity to the president, and the environment of
a group of political demonstrators, that got them the attention they so
eagerly sought. And they got it, as they know perfectly well, because they
created an ambiguous "message" that implied a threat. That's why the media
were there. And getting attention was their whole point. If there hadn't
been the ambiguity of the "message," including the possibility of a threat,
no one would have paid attention.


And whether any of you bozos realize it or not
he did those of us who own gun NO favors at all.


THIS is not the kind of publicity we want on public TV.


No...thats the sort of publicity we get from LEFTWINGER Anti-gun
fanatics.

They made a big deal about Right Wing Klanners yada yada...and
specifically avoided pointing out that the guy was Black.


So its not a gun issue, but a Leftwing Extremist Media who lies like a
cheap rug issue .




"First Law of Leftist Debate
The more you present a leftist with factual evidence
that is counter to his preconceived world view and the
more difficult it becomes for him to refute it without
losing face the chance of him calling you a racist, bigot,
homophobe approaches infinity.

This is despite the thread you are in having not mentioned
race or sexual preference in any way that is relevant to
the subject." Grey Ghost