On Thu, 03 Sep 2009 19:07:14 -0700, rangerssuck wrote:
On Sep 3, 4:03*pm, Richard the Dreaded Libertarian
On Wed, 02 Sep 2009 16:34:15 -0700, rangerssuck wrote:
On Sep 2, 6:27*pm, Richard the Dreaded Libertarian
On Tue, 01 Sep 2009 23:28:41 -0400, Ed Huntress wrote:

You say you "imagine" that the man was trying to say something.
What do you suppose he was trying to "say"? When people speak with
loaded firearms in a crowd, I'd like to know what their message is.
The only ones I can think of have to do with intimidation. Can you
clear that up for us?

Maybe his message was:
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free
*State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be
*infringed."

Just for clarity:
"Militia: the entire body of physically fit civilians eligible by law
for *military service; "their troops were untrained militia";
"Congress shall *have power to provide for calling forth the
militia" * --United States Constitution.
wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn

Hey Richard - can you now please provide a definition of "well
regulated?"

Sure - well-trained. And, if the government storm troopers (which they
call the "militia" even though they're not) get out of line, then the
citizens will have the power to regulate their asses off.

Can you try that again, in English? With what militia did the AR-15 guy
train?

Probably on his own property. What exactly is it you mean by "with what
milltia?" There's only one - every able-bodied adult citizen of the
country.

When is the last time he drilled with them?

This is a strawman, and irrelevant.

What is his rank?

The highest "rank" of all - civilian.

To whom does he report?

God? To whom would you have him "report"?

Thanks,
Rich