krw wrote:

The dingbat is claiming that there was no crime committed because it
wasn't intentional.

That explains a lot, you are delusional...

You simply cannot make a legal claim based on whether something was an
"accident."

The dolt thinks the crime is in the intent.

I think because their was no intent it was an accident. Webster agrees
with me.

--
Jack
Using FREE News Server: http://www.eternal-september.org/
http://jbstein.com