"Gunner Asch" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 02 Sep 2009 16:36:39 -0500, Ignoramus22805
wrote:

On 2009-09-02, Gunner Asch wrote:
On Wed, 02 Sep 2009 10:43:42 -0500, Ignoramus22805
wrote:

Being a cynical person, I cannot believe that an ability of lawmen to
dispatch those they disliked "with minimum fuss" was a good thing.

I would much rather prefer a modern society under the rule of law, a
polite society where guns are carried, but not used much. When I lived
in Oklahoma, it was much like that.

i
And why do you think that guns are carried, but not used much?

Think before replying.

As opposed to places where guns are carried, and used a lot, like that
town where only the 72nd person died a natural death?

Which town was that..and in which year? And who died..the good guys..or
the bad guys?
G

Maybe for two reasons:

1) People are less desperate to risk their lives for a buck
or
2) The ones who would risk their lives for violent confrontations did
not leave offspring.

i

#2 of course.

Gunner

The town was Pioche, Nevada, year circa 1875. And I have noticed that lazy
welfare people, criminals, and ne'er do wells are usually incredibly
fertile.

Steve