View Single Post
  #7   Report Post  
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
[email protected] dcaster@krl.org is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,984
Default Bring a gun and have some fun in LV

On Aug 29, 4:12*pm, "Ed Huntress" wrote:

But the city figures are still unreliable for reasons that aren't worth
going into here. The one category of crime that is, and always has been,
extremely accurate is the murder rate. You can't easily hide murders. So if
you want to be fussy about it, start with that.

But the criticism of M-Q really should be directed at the FBI and at the
local reporting agencies for UCR. M-Q just reports what those agencies
report -- of course it's a "rehash of readily available statistics." That's
what CQ Press does -- report summaries of official statistics.

Overall, their reports are generally accurate. When you have a murder rate
of 9.0/100k, like Nevada, and compare it with some state that has a rate of
8.9, the comparisons are speculative. But when it's 9.0 (Nevada) versus 4..9
(New Jersey), or 1.2 or whatever (Hawaii), those UCR errors are not a
factor.

The criticism about relative city sizes and demographics is something for
the social scientists to worry about. This is just a state ranking. If you
live in Nevada, you're roughly twice as likely to be murdered than you are
if you live in NJ -- and the city issues and demographics actually work
against Nevada in the comparison. Those are just the facts, not sociological
theorizing.

--
Ed Huntress


Very confusing to me. The city figures are unreliable. The state
figures are compiled from the city figures, but somehow are more
reliable?

I agree the murder rates ought to be more reliable than say armed
robbery rates. But some murders might get plea bargained to
manslaughter. The number probably varies from state to state.

I knew a guy that robbed a gas station with a shotgun, but was
persuaded to turn himself in. I forget what he was convicted of, but
it was something much less than armed robbery. Se he probably did not
raise the violent crime rate.

At any rate there is probably no halo effect. In general criminal do
not think they are going to get caught. If they did they would not
commit crimes. In the same way, I do not think that they think about
the possibility that a intended victim might be armed.

I also think that there may be a correlation between the number of
violent crimes and the number of CCW permits. But it is more likely
that a high rate of violent crimes causes an increase in CCW permits.
If New Jersey had a high rate of violent crime, the government would
be under a lot of pressure to issue more CCW permits.


Dan