Please understand, if I am a bit disbelieving of you. My
experience wtih government programs is that they grow more
complicated every year. My experience with things that have
no competition, is that they rapidly increase price, and
rapidly lose quality.

Since you have spent hours in SS hearings (which are single
payer, and have no competition), why would you expect
different from single payer, no competition medical? Hmm?

--
Christopher A. Young
Learn more about Jesus
www.lds.org
..


"Master Betty" wrote in message
...

Look at the cost savings of streamlining the healthcare
system to a one
payer system.

I'm not going to try to convince you because I doubt you
have the knowledge
I have from working in the beast for over a decade.

HC in the US involves so much bureaucracy. I've spent hours
in Social
Security hearings with ALJs Doctors and Therapist. The time
those hearings
take could be eliminated right there. You may get the
opportunity to get a
Medicare claim denied and you'll see what I mean.

The 2 payer system creates another massive layer of paper
work most people
are not really aware of. A HUGE portion of your hc dollar
goes to needless
paperwork and feeding a world of paper pushers you are not
probably totally
aware of.

If we did go to a "national" hc system this ALL could be
done with a push of
the button by THE DOCTOR. No billing office!

I've debated this before and found most ng bloggers lack
much of an
understanding about the process. Sorry, but to me, you guys
are like fish in
a barrel. Face it........there is a lot we need to learn.