"Bill Noble" wrote in message
...

"Don Foreman" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 23:28:06 -0500, Ignoramus1057
wrote:

On 2009-08-18, Pete C. wrote:

Bill Noble wrote:

so, what will happen to a household which does not have the money to
purchase a gun, or for religious or other reasons does not wish to own
one?
This is as clear an overstepping of bounds as I am aware of.

This is a clear lack of reading comprehension, not overstepping of
bounds. Read again, the key word is "should" as opposed to "shall" or
"must".

I am a little lost, then, as to what exactly is the legal requirement
of this law.

i

A resolution is not a law. It's more like a suggestion or call to
citizens to "let's do this". It can legally be ignored.

so, this is just a bunch of guys getting together and saying that everyone
in the city ought to have some guns? Is that what the citizens elected
their city council to do - have bull sessions and make meaningless
suggestions?

Yeah. Things like the citizenry keep some foodstocks and water in case of
emergency, own a portable generator, keep the dry leaves and vegetation from
around their houses, clean up their yards, meaningless stuff like that.

Steve