|
Posted to sci.electronics.design,alt.binaries.schematics.electronic,sci.electronics.cad
|
|
|
This will send a chill down your spine...
flipper wrote:
On Fri, 7 Aug 2009 09:59:19 -0500, "Ouroboros Rex"
wrote:
flipper wrote:
On Thu, 6 Aug 2009 09:31:56 -0500, "Ouroboros Rex"
wrote:
flipper wrote:
On Wed, 5 Aug 2009 11:43:27 -0500, "Ouroboros Rex"
wrote:
Jim Thompson wrote:
This will send a chill down your spine...
http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/Facts...ubborn-Things/
Big brother is watching... big time :-(
Bull****.
"There is a lot of disinformation about health insurance reform
out there, spanning from control of personal finances to end of
life care. These rumors often travel just below the surface via
chain emails or through casual conversation. Since we can't
keep track of all of them here at the White House, we're asking
for your help. If you get an email or see something on the web
about health insurance reform that seems fishy, send it to
."
You are such a good little mind numbed robot.
When, in the immediate aftermath of 9/11, the Bush Administration
asked the public to keep an eye out for potentially life
threatening, illegal, terrorist activity and report same to the
appropriate authorities the left went into an apoplectic fit
screaming fascist, fascist, but you think it's perfectly fine for
people to collect and send private communications to the White
House for nothing more threatening than expressing a political
opinion Obama doesn't like.
Let's see, the left says reporting life threatening illegal
activities bad.
Bull****.
and the left is full of it.
Hate to burst your fascist bubble but the First Amendment doesn't
say only speech Obama likes, or only speech you like, or only
speech Obama deems politically appropriate or only speech Obama,
in his great wisdom. deems the one and only 'truth'. It protects
SPEECH.
Only a complete idiot would think this is for anything but
rebuttal. lol
Frankly, my dear, I don't give a flying fig *what* your twisted
little swastika imagines the 'purpose' to be. It's a violation of
both free speech and privacy rights,
Pathetic lie.
Spoken like a good loyal fascist.
What you mean is, you can't find proof one for your lie above. lol
regardless, and the Constitution makes no
exceptions for "unless the Obama administration finds infringing on
these rights convenient for stomping on it's political opposition"
nor is there one for 'convenient rebuttal'.
But, since liberals don't give a dam what the Constitution says, I
feel compelled to point out it's also illegal by statute passed by a
Democrat Congress.
Pathetic lie.
ditto
What you mean is, you can't find proof one for your lie above. lol
And, as I already mentioned in the parts you dishonestly snipped,
all of it is readily available on the Internet ranging from
'mainstream' new sources, to editorials, to blogs, to youtube and
the only schmucks apparently not only deaf dumb and blind to the
deluge of concern but unable to google and click on a link to
inform themselves are Mr. Teachable Moment and his 'communications
director'.
Pathetic lie.
ditto
What you mean is, you can't find proof one for your lie above. lol
|