View Single Post
  #15   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
Simon[_10_] Simon[_10_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 86
Default adding loading to old RSJ

On 12 Aug, 20:34, "BigWallop" wrote:
"Simon" wrote in message

...
On 12 Aug, 08:37, Simon wrote: On 12 Aug, 04:20, John Rumm wrote:

BigWallop wrote:


snipped

Well, the struct eng that validated my roof design says they would
want 150+vat for a site visit to confirm some drawings I do for them
and to check end bearings etc, then about 105+vat for calcs to confirm
and also design an acceptable way to hang a purlin from an existing
RSJ. Does that seem reasonable ?
Question is - do I bother ?
Only thing as regards purlin on RSJ, is its loading on one side that
could try to twist the RSJ. I'm sure I'd get away with just doing it,
but for insurance purposes, etc it may be a good idea.
Simon.

It will be money well spent for the peace of mind you get with a proper job.
I'd say "go with the struct' eng" and make sure the whole thing lasts the
years you want it to.

I do the same as you. *I look at it for months, then decide I can do the
work without problems, then change my mind and ask someone I know, with a
greater experience of the actual calculations, to come in and tell me I am
correct. *But it seems to have been a good way of doing things, just for the
peace of mind I get knowing the work is done properly.


I've had a look at the RSJ over the other side of the house (the
kitchen), and that is interestingly two parallel RSJs 3.5" by 7" with
similar flange and web sizes to the other 5" x 6" RSJ. I'm guessing
the parallel ones start with stretchers rather than headers.
It would be interesting to have seen these houses being built. Massive
gobs of lime mortar and beefy RSJs being thrown around everywhere
would be quite a sight !
Simon.