Oh yeah, "even water can be burned as fuel".

i

On 2009-07-27, cavelamb wrote:
Very interesting story though...



The GEET Plasma Reactor

Though the GEET technology has struggled for acceptance in the United States,
the it has been much more popular and respected in Europe and other places
around the world, where it is the subject in college curriculum and is being
pursued commercially by far more groups, including a helicopter application.

Simply put, the GEET, which stands for Global Environmental Energy Technology,
is a reaction chamber that involves engine exhaust flowing one direction, along
a magnetic rod of a specified length (particular to the vehicle and fuel), with
the fuel flowing in the opposite direction. Somehow, the fuel goes into a form
of plasma, at a temperature much lower than it is usually created using
electrical arcs. The plasma causes the fuel molecules to disassociate into
their elemental form, where they recombine into syngas, which burns more readily
and with less waste than petrol.

Many waste-to-energy methods use a high intensity plasma arc to convert the
incoming waste feedstock into syngas, which can be burned as fuel. The
relatively low temperature plasma creation in the patented GEET reactor is also
why other substances can be added to the fuel and be burned as fuel, including
the signature pickle juice, Windex, pee, and even water. But these well-founded
and documented claims sounded like science fiction to the Utah judicial system,
who presumed that Paul must have something wrong in the head.

In the interview, I mentioned to Paul that in preparation for the interview I
was reviewing some stories we've posted while he was incarcerated, and I was
struck by one that noted that a "plasma-assisted combustion" process reported by
Los Alamos National Laboratories provides mainstream documentation of his
claims. Paul pointed out that two of the men in that research group at Los
Alamos were trained by him in his GEET course. He said there were also four
people from NASA who attended his course, though not as representing NASA.

He also mentioned that when a story came out about MIT's "Plasmatron", that he
got around 200 emails from people saying, "Hey, that's your technology!"