Meat Plow wrote:
On Sat, 25 Jul 2009 23:07:18 +1000, Bob Larter
wrote:

Meat Plow wrote:
On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 17:37:46 +1000, Bob Larter
wrote:

notme wrote:
What is it about laser printers that causes UPS manufacturers to recommend
they not be powered by a "stepped approximation to sine" UPS? It's a SMSP,
isn't it? What makes it special such that it needs sine-only? No such caution
re. computers, etc...
The big difference is that lasers usually have a mains powered quartz
lamp inside the fuser assembly to cook the toner onto the paper. My
guess would be that the lamp puts a huge current spike on the mains each
time it powers up, which is every minute or so. If so, that spike might
overload the UPS.
The fuser in the older HP lasers was on even waiting for a print job.
There was a thermostat on the lamp strip inside the roller to keep the
fuser roller at a constant temp.
Yes, that's correct. (Fixed hundreds of them, back in the days.)

First Laserjet printer I owned was a 4+. Snagged it from a client who
was going to dumpster it after I installed a LJ 6p. The 4 had a high
print count maybe upawards of 50k but after a good cleaning including
inside the laser assembly prism and spreader lens it worked perfect
and I've been using it for 7 years now

The older engines are by far the best. I've seen Canon SX engine
printers (eg; the HP Series 2) still going strong at half a million
prints. Dust 'em out every now & then, scrub the rollers with acetone
every couple of years, & they last forever. I heard of one unit (in a
police department) that was still going strong at 1.5 million prints.
The MX engines are pretty good too, but the SX engine is still the king.

--
W
. | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because
\|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est
---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------