In article , harry k wrote:
On Jun 23, 3:31=A0pm, (Doug Miller) wrote:
In article =
..com, harry k wrote:





On Jun 23, 4:23=3DA0am, (Doug Miller) wrote:
In article =
ups=3D
..com, Red wrote:

This subject is just like arguing politics or religion - neither side
will change their viewpoint. =3DA0Those of us who have had it work on=
many
occasions and know it works will never convince those who will never
get off their dead asses and try it.

I'll be convinced as soon as I see it demonstrated under controlled
conditions. You claim to "have had it work on many occasions" -- go cl=
aim=3D
your
million dollars.

Or explain why you're unwilling to be tested under controlled conditio=
ns.

Or perhaps you could read what I have written where I said they have
failed me?

In other words... IT DOESN'T WORK. When you "succeeded" the obvious
explanation is that you ALREADY KNEW where the item was.- Hide quoted tex=
t -

- Show quoted text -

My God! You finally read and _understood_ at least a few of my
posts. About damn time.

Oh, get off it, Harry. You've been saying all along that it works, and I've
been saying all along that it doesn't.