Dave Balderstone wrote in
news:140620091728347964%dave@N_O_T_T_H_I_Sbalderst one.ca:

Who, in your opinion, should be allowed to decide whether or not a
legally available item should be in the possession of any particular
individual?

As a further exercise, what legally available items should be in that
decision tree?

I never said it would be easy to decide where the dividing line should be.
To me it is common sense that should dictate it. Go see Gran Torino, and
decide who should or should not have had weapons. To me it seems easy. I
for one should not have dangerous stuff, because I'm a hot head. And
because the only experience with "fire weapons" that I had was at a
carnival when I was 16.

--
Best regards
Han
email address is invalid