On Jun 11, 11:52*am, "Bob F" wrote:
wrote:
On Jun 11, 10:30 am, wrote:
On 11 Jun 2009 12:23:58 GMT, Jim Yanik wrote:

"George Jetson" wrote in
:

"DGDevin" wrote in message
news:P5Kdna7eCdMxPa3XnZ2dnUVZ_gKdnZ2d@earthlin k.com...
Bozo wrote:

On Jun 10, 7:51 pm, Oren wrote:

Will they use a tele-promter?

I wonder what those irrational Bush haters would have said if W.
had relied on one of those things even for events that are
expected to be spontaneous. But the propaganda machine is oiled
and tuned and we'll be lucky to be getting even a remotely
reasonable facsimile of the truth by the end of Barack's first,
and God willing, last term. Everything this guy says is shrouded
in the Move-On mist. He makes the Clintons look like amateurs.

Yeah, good point, using a teleprompter is waaaay more serious than
starting a war on false pretenses.

only one with BDS would continue to insist the Iraq was began on
"false pretenses". Before Bush became president,BJClinton also
stated Saddam still had WMD. Foreign leaders all believed he had
WMD.

And theere was more than just that reasom for going to war with
Saddam. You folks just didn't listen.

Saddam, as evil as he was, was also a major foe of Bin Laden, and was
doing a better job then we have at containing him. Taking out Saddam
was a gift to Bin Laden.

Oh, interesting and new theory. * Exactly what evidence is there that
Saddam was actively involved in trying to contain Bin Laden? *What
specific actions did Saddam take to contain him? * AFAIK, Bin Laden
was running terrorist training camps in Afghanistan which 50K+ Al-
Qaeda went through for years. * And nobody, certainly not Saddam, was
doing a damn thing about it.

The only camp in Iraq was in the north where Saddam could not get at it because
of our "no fly zone"

Saddam and bin Laden were clearly not friendly.

The issue isn't whether Saddam and Bin Laden were not friendly. The
issue is I'd like to see any credible reference for this statement:

"Saddam, as evil as he was, was also a major foe of Bin Laden, and was
doing a better job then we have at containing him"

Because I believe it's a total fabrication. Saddam wasn't doing
anything to contain Bin Laden. No one was. He was openly running
50K+ terrorists through camps in Afghanistan. Excuse me, but I think
it's important that we not re-write history.